You can be 5' tall, weigh 300 pounds, and still be petite, right?
posted by:
|
|
Unsubscribed |
-
Re: by definition
Mon, November 7, 2005 - 1:25 PMno offense, but i don't think so. -
-
Unsu...
Re: by definition
Mon, November 7, 2005 - 8:40 PMNone taken. And I'm not wrong. The limit is actually 5'4" tall. I verified this with the folks in the Petite's section of Macy's. This website also corroborates:
www.sideroad.com/Beauty/pe...othes.html
Here's another one.
www.shortsupport.org/Resourc...men.html
I mean, I know this almost clinical definition is what none of us have in mind, but for specificity's sake... -
-
Re: by definition
Tue, November 8, 2005 - 12:25 PMto me petite is a reference to body size as well as height...i would be more likely to consider a moderately tall thin woman petite, rather then a curvy shorter woman...Just my opinion, again not trying to offend anyone. -
-
Re: by definition
Tue, November 8, 2005 - 6:14 PMa 5-ft. tall woman weighing 300 pounds would be considered deathly obese.
in my head, that kinda negates the "petite" moniker altogether.
but that's just me thinking out loud...
-
-
Re: by definition
Wed, November 9, 2005 - 4:23 AMI might not have the oficial def on hand but thats not mine, and in mine you can be 10'
it;s abaut the look -
-
Unsu...
Re: by definition
Wed, November 9, 2005 - 1:07 PMI know what I like to imagine when I'm thinking "petite," even if the definition does stipulate any size for a woman 5'4" tall or less. I'm not into spherical women. I don't think any of us are.
And that's all I was going to say. But this last post is essentially saying, "I don't care what the book says, I'm writing my own dictionary." I know many republicans who think like that. -
-
Re: by definition
Wed, November 9, 2005 - 1:43 PMit's really simple actually.
when you are talking about clothes size (ie Macy's) "Petite" means "short". that's it. there are plus sized petites. someone can be a size 20 but still need a petite becuase if they don't buy that then the pants will drag on the floor and the sleves will be 4 inches too long. so by definition in the clothing market - petite merely means SHORT. not short and thin.
sociologically however, petite is normally considered small all around. thin as well as short.
-
-
Re: by definition
Wed, November 9, 2005 - 2:56 PMCrista has spoken. I defer...... -
-
Re: by definition
Wed, November 9, 2005 - 2:57 PMBesides, "5' tall, weigh 300 pounds" would be "round", utterly round. -
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: by definition
Thu, November 10, 2005 - 9:25 AMI am "5' tall but very cruvey in all the right palces so I'm told. I'm not fat but, but I am also not thin...I consider myself petite and very...female. -
-
-
-
Re: by definition
Thu, November 10, 2005 - 6:15 PMcurvy, petite women who are shaped like "women" - that's alright by me. girls with dangerous curves are awesome!
if there ain't no curves, it ain't worth drivin'.
"spherical" - that's a whole different thing.
probably not from a recognizable planet?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: by definition
Sun, November 13, 2005 - 11:53 AMpetite - adjective (Cambridge Univ. Dictionary)
1 APPROVINGLY If a woman or girl is petite, she is small and thin in an attractive way: She was dark and petite, as all his wives had been.
2 of a clothing size that is for small women
The Cambridge definition captures how I've always interpreted "petite:" small and thin. And as far as that goes, I see no conflict between being "thin" and being "curvy;" the terms are not mutally exclusive! -
-
Re: by definition
Mon, November 14, 2005 - 11:15 AM>>"I see no conflict between being "thin" and being "curvy;" the terms are not mutally exclusive!"<<
Well, you've probably never asked a woman who sees herself as "curvy" if there's a 'conflict' in the terms. ;-) -
-
Re: by definition
Mon, November 14, 2005 - 2:23 PMreminds me of a discussion of another conflict - or it could be the same one - the question: "do i look fat?" - even if the woman is 15 pounds under weight or 1 pound over - does not have a correct answer. you could say no, but she will disagree and not be content with whatever your answer is either way.
if you say curvy, it will be misinterpreted as "fat". if you say 'you look fine' - misinterpreted as "fat". if you say 'you look perfect just the way you are"...."fat". heaven forbid you should say something like "don't worry about it."
when that question is asked, run. run far, run fast. return with expensive gifts, preferably jewels.
there's your conflict! lol
a petite (4'10" @ 94 lbs.) woman that i lived with/dated for a few years - beautiful lady from hawaii with a great figure - i commented and complimented on her great legs and how nice her posterior was, the great "shape" it has, (she's a professional dancer) that it looked like a great piece of artwork. she thinks she's got a fat butt and thick legs (her words.) ??wtf?? -
-
Re: by definition
Mon, November 14, 2005 - 5:39 PMwomen are often insecure with their bodies and need reassurance. i, personally, am underweight and it doesn't matter who tells me that i am NOT too thin, i still feel like my bones protrude out everywhere. i think that TV and magazines have a way of making the "real" woman feel imperfect, regardless of which way the scale sways.
just look her in the eye, tip her chin up, and tell her "you look gorgeous."
she may disagree with you, but she still heard it, and that's what really matters. -
-
Re: by definition
Mon, November 14, 2005 - 5:53 PM>>just look her in the eye, tip her chin up, and tell her "you look gorgeous."<<
Crista...Since they say that photos don't lie....you look gorgeous.
:) -
-
-
Re: by definition
Mon, November 14, 2005 - 8:24 PMhad i seen you in my club when i was dj-ing in chicago, i would have stopped the music just to tell you that you are gorgeous!
seriously.
have a great night!
-
Re: by definition
Mon, November 14, 2005 - 8:38 PMWhy do I suddenly have a deep desire to shop for real estate in Chicago? -
-
Re: by definition
Mon, November 14, 2005 - 8:54 PMhmmmm....the spell is working......
;-) -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: by definition
Mon, November 14, 2005 - 8:56 PMI'd be in deep trouble. Its likely Crista could sell me anything.
Crista...oddly enough we have the same exact number of friends on our tribe lists. *cue twilight zone music*
-
-
-
-
Re: by definition
Mon, November 14, 2005 - 8:31 PMi have a friend that is a taller girl, but very svelte. she hates it when people ask her if she's bulimic or anorexic or whatever. she eats like a horse, she's athletic and toned, but still...slender beyond anyone else's "thin" jealousy levels. people told her that she should be a model - she tried it for a while and hated it. got into another type of "beauty contest" - broadcasting. she's still a "skinny mini" - but pretty nonetheless. i wish i had that problem. i can't comment or compliment her - it makes her angry as well. so i just don't even bring it up! problem solved!
lol -
-
Re: by definition
Mon, November 21, 2005 - 9:02 AM>> she hates it when people ask her if she's bulimic or anorexic or whatever. <<
?? You make it sound like this puzzles you. -
-
Re: by definition
Mon, November 21, 2005 - 11:24 AMwomen as a whole puzzle me, but i guess that's what draws me to them and why i find a majority of them intriguing!
the fact that she's amazingly pretty and yet, people still try to find something wrong with her is what's puzzling. i can't say that i blame her for getting agitated when people ask her such silly things. puzzling, yet understandable.
kinda sorta like when people ask me if i am black after i tell them that mom is from trinidad.
-
-
-
Re: by definition
Mon, November 14, 2005 - 11:07 PM"NOT too thin"?
Why don't you just say chubby?
You are chubby!
Actually not chubby, just plain fat.
Say it!
Also I want you to go to gym every other day and start on a diet.
:).
-
-
Re: by definition
Tue, November 15, 2005 - 7:36 AM*looks at self in mirror*
oh yeah i'm totally fat.
LMAO -
-
Re: by definition
Tue, November 15, 2005 - 9:19 PMgoodness, at least he didn't bust out with 'porky' or anything...
(btw - crista, tell the "gold coast" hi for me - i miss it! lol)
-
Re: by definition
Tue, November 15, 2005 - 11:11 PMyeah, my ex used to complain about being "fat" when she had a 24 inch waist (5'9" too, hardly petite). it's just a fact of life. -
-
Re: by definition
Wed, November 16, 2005 - 12:39 PMAll women should be content with the body they have when they are eating right and getting a healthy amount of exercise. This is advice that I myself need to listen to: I've fought a life-long battle with anorexia that I inherited from my mother (also a petite woman). I'm not active in the disease now, but there's always an internal temptation to call myself a fat-ass when I see my reflection, which usually leads to a relapse.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: by definition
Mon, February 20, 2006 - 1:39 PMThom: "I see no conflict between being "thin" and being "curvy;" the terms are not mutally exclusive!"
Tattoo: "Well, you've probably never asked a woman who sees herself as "curvy" if there's a 'conflict' in the terms. ;-)"
Tom... You didn't seriously mean to imply that a woman who's "curvy" CANNOT also be "thin," did you? You misinterpreted, "not mutually exclusive," correct? If something is "mutually exclusive" it necessitates a choice between possibilities... "either 'this' or 'that'"... "you can't have 'one' if you have the 'other'!" So when I said the terms "thin" and "curvy" are NOT mutually exclusive, all I'm saying is, both can exist! ;)
-
-
